RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies an optional standard for TCP to increase the permitted initial window from one segment to roughly 4K bytes, replacing RFC 2414. This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the higher initial window. The document includes discussion of experiments and simulations showing that the higher initial window does not lead to congestion collapse. Finally, the document provides guidance on implementation issues.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3390
- Published
- November 2002
- Authors
- M. Allman; S. Floyd; C. Partridge
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3517A Conservative Selective Acknowledgment (SACK)-based Loss Recovery Algorithm for TCPObsoleted
April 2003
- RFC 3522The Eifel Detection Algorithm for TCPCurrent
April 2003
- RFC 3540Robust Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Signaling with NoncesCurrent
June 2003
- RFC 3649HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion WindowsCurrent
December 2003
- RFC 3042Enhancing TCP's Loss Recovery Using Limited TransmitCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 3742Limited Slow-Start for TCP with Large Congestion WindowsCurrent
March 2004
- RFC 3782The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery AlgorithmObsoleted
April 2004
- RFC 2988Computing TCP's Retransmission TimerObsoleted
November 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?