RFC 2629: Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 7749.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 7991 — The "xml2rfc" Version 3 Vocabulary
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo presents a technique for using XML (Extensible Markup Language) as a source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts (I-Ds) and Request for Comments (RFC) series. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2629
- Published
- June 1999
- Authors
- M. Rose
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 31
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 7749
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2629 (1999)
- RFC 7749 (2016)
- RFC 7991 (2016) ✓
Read the full history of The "xml2rfc" Version 3 Vocabulary →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2593Script MIB Extensibility Protocol Version 1.0Obsoleted
May 1999
- RFC 2706ECML v1: Field Names for E-CommerceObsoleted
October 1999
- RFC 2731Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTMLObsoleted
December 1999
- RFC 2376XML Media TypesObsoleted
July 1998
- RFC 3106ECML v1.1: Field Specifications for E-CommerceUpdated
April 2001
- RFC 3120A URN Namespace for XML.orgCurrent
June 2001
- RFC 3179Script MIB Extensibility Protocol Version 1.1Current
October 2001
- RFC 1980A Proposed Extension to HTML : Client-Side Image MapsObsoleted
August 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?