RFC 2376: XML Media Types
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 3023.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 7303 — XML Media Types
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document proposes two new media subtypes, text/xml and application/xml, for use in exchanging network entities which are conforming Extensible Markup Language (XML). This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2376
- Published
- July 1998
- Authors
- E. Whitehead; M. Murata
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 3023
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2376 (1998)
- RFC 3023 (2001)
- RFC 7303 (2014) ✓
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2186Internet Cache Protocol (ICP), version 2Current
September 1997
- RFC 2731Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTMLObsoleted
December 1999
- RFC 2518HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring -- WEBDAVObsoleted
February 1999
- RFC 2935Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP) HTTP SupplementCurrent
September 2000
- RFC 4918HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)Updated
June 2007
- RFC 1980A Proposed Extension to HTML : Client-Side Image MapsObsoleted
August 1996
- RFC 3120A URN Namespace for XML.orgCurrent
June 2001
- RFC 3205On the use of HTTP as a SubstrateObsoleted
February 2002
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?