RFC 2477: Criteria for Evaluating Roaming Protocols
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes requirements for the provisioning of "roaming capability" for dialup Internet users. "Roaming capability" is defined as the ability to use multiple Internet service providers (ISPs), while maintaining a formal, customer-vendor relationship with only one. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2477
- Published
- January 1999
- Authors
- B. Aboba; G. Zorn
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2270Using a Dedicated AS for Sites Homed to a Single ProviderCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 3098How to Advertise Responsibly Using E-Mail and Newsgroups or - how NOT to $$$$$ MAKE ENEMIES FAST! $$$$$Current
April 2001
- RFC 3178IPv6 Multihoming Support at Site Exit RoutersCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 2430A Provider Architecture for Differentiated Services and Traffic Engineering (PASTE)Current
October 1998
- RFC 2267Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address SpoofingObsoleted
January 1998
- RFC 2260Scalable Support for Multi-homed Multi-provider ConnectivityCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2194Review of Roaming ImplementationsCurrent
September 1997
- RFC 2779Instant Messaging / Presence Protocol RequirementsCurrent
February 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?