RFC 1879: Class A Subnet Experiment Results and Recommendations
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo documents some experiences with the RFC 1797 [1] subnet A experiment (performed by the Net39 Test Group (see credits)) and provides a number of recommendations on future direction for both the Internet Registries and the Operations community. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1879
- Published
- January 1996
- Authors
- B. Manning
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 6
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2477Criteria for Evaluating Roaming ProtocolsCurrent
January 1999
- RFC 1895The Application/CALS-1840 Content-typeCurrent
February 1996
- RFC 1896The text/enriched MIME Content-typeCurrent
February 1996
- RFC 1862Report of the IAB Workshop on Internet Information Infrastructure, October 12-14, 1994Current
November 1995
- RFC 1858Security Considerations for IP Fragment FilteringUpdated
October 1995
- RFC 1911Voice Profile for Internet MailObsoleted
February 1996
- RFC 1822A Grant of Rights to Use a Specific IBM patent with PhoturisCurrent
August 1995
- RFC 1820Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent ChecklistObsoleted
August 1995
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?