RFC 1871: Addendum to RFC 1602 -- Variance Procedure
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2026.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 2026 — The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a modification to the IETF procedures to allow an escape from a situation where the existing procedures are not working or do not seem to apply. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1871
- Published
- November 1995
- Authors
- J. Postel
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 4
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2026
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 4 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1310 (1992)
- RFC 1602 (1994)
- RFC 1871 (1995)
- RFC 2026 (1996) ✓
Read the full history of The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3 →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2418IETF Working Group Guidelines and ProceduresUpdated
September 1998
- RFC 3934Updates to RFC 2418 Regarding the Management of IETF Mailing ListsObsoleted
October 2004
- RFC 1818Best Current PracticesCurrent
August 1995
- RFC 2357IETF Criteria for Evaluating Reliable Multicast Transport and Application ProtocolsCurrent
June 1998
- RFC 2551The Roman Standards Process -- Revision IIICurrent
April 1999
- RFC 6335Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number RegistryCurrent
August 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?