RFC 2357: IETF Criteria for Evaluating Reliable Multicast Transport and Application Protocols
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo describes the procedures and criteria for reviewing reliable multicast protocols within the Transport Area (TSV) of the IETF. Within today's Internet, important applications exist for a reliable multicast service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2357
- Published
- June 1998
- Authors
- A. Mankin; A. Romanow; S. Bradner; V. Paxson
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2339An Agreement Between the Internet Society, the IETF, and Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the matter of NFS V.4 ProtocolsCurrent
May 1998
- RFC 2436Collaboration between ISOC/IETF and ITU-TObsoleted
October 1998
- RFC 1718The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of the Internet Engineering Task ForceObsoleted
November 1994
- RFC 31133GPP-IETF Standardization CollaborationCurrent
June 2001
- RFC 31313GPP2-IETF Standardization CollaborationCurrent
June 2001
- RFC 3233Defining the IETFCurrent
February 2002
- RFC 3356Internet Engineering Task Force and International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunications Standardization Sector Collaboration GuidelinesObsoleted
August 2002
- RFC 2438Advancement of MIB specifications on the IETF Standards TrackCurrent
October 1998
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?