ObsoletedHISTORICLegacy stream

RFC 1119: Network Time Protocol (version 2) specification and implementation

This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 1305.

Current document in this lineage: RFC 5905Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document describes the Network Time Protocol (NTP), specifies its formal structure and summarizes information useful for its implementation. NTP provides the mechanisms to synchronize time and coordinate time distribution in a large, diverse internet operating at rates from mundane to lightwave. It uses a returnable-time design in which a distributed subnet of time servers operating in a self- organizing, hierarchical-master-slave configuration synchronizes local clocks within the subnet and to national time standards via wire or radio. The servers can also redistribute reference time via local routing algorithms and time daemons. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Document record

Document ID
RFC1119
Published
September 1989
Authors
D.L. Mills
Status
HISTORIC
Stream
Legacy
Area
Pages
1
Also known as
Obsoletes:
RFC 958, RFC 1059
Obsoleted by:
RFC 1305

Topics

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 9 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 958 (1985)
  2. RFC 1059 (1988)
  3. RFC 1119 (1989)
  4. RFC 1305 (1992)
  5. RFC 1361 (1992)
  6. RFC 1769 (1995)
  7. RFC 2030 (1996)
  8. RFC 4330 (2006)
  9. RFC 5905 (2010)

Read the full history of Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification

Referenced by

One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/1119-network-time-protocol-version-2-specification-and-implementation