RFC 9994: MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack Specification Including In-Stack Network Actions and Data
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies the MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack for carrying network actions and Ancillary Data (AD) in the MPLS label stack. MNA can be used to influence packet-forwarding decisions, carry additional Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) information in the MPLS packet, or perform user-defined operations. This document updates RFC 9789 to refine the list of pieces of information that must be included in any document that defines an MNA.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9994
- Published
- June 2026
- Authors
- J. Rajamanickam; R. Gandhi; R. Zigler; H. Song; K. Kompella
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 28
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 9789
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9992Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) Key/Value Topology Information Elements Structure and ProcessingCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 9986Meticulous Keyed ISAAC for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Optimized AuthenticationCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 9985Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) AuthenticationCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 10005BGP Link Bandwidth Extended CommunityCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 9983OSPFv2 Anycast Property AdvertisementCurrent
May 2026
- RFC 9978Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) StabilityCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 9974Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Requirements for the Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) LayerCurrent
June 2026
- RFC 10018Multicast and Ethernet VPN with Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) and Ingress ReplicationCurrent
August 2026
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?