RFC 9885: Multi-Part TLVs in IS-IS
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
New technologies are adding new information into IS-IS while deployment scales are simultaneously increasing. This causes the contents of many critical TLVs to exceed the currently supported limit of 255 octets. This document codifies the common mechanism of extending the TLV content space through multiple TLVs.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9885
- Published
- October 2025
- Authors
- P. Kaneriya; T. Li; A. Przygienda; S. Hegde; L. Ginsberg
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 26
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9884Label Switched Path Ping for Segment Routing Path Segment Identifier with MPLS Data PlaneCurrent
October 2025
- RFC 9889A Realization of Network Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS TechnologiesCurrent
November 2025
- RFC 9892Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Traffic Classification Data ItemCurrent
January 2026
- RFC 9893Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Credit-Based Flow Control Messages and Data ItemsCurrent
January 2026
- RFC 9894Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware Credit Window ExtensionCurrent
January 2026
- RFC 9895Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window ExtensionCurrent
January 2026
- RFC 9871BGP Color-Aware Routing (CAR)Current
November 2025
- RFC 9902A YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing over the MPLS Data PlaneCurrent
December 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?