RFC 9881: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Algorithm Identifiers for the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Digital signatures are used within X.509 certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), and to sign messages. This document specifies the conventions for using FIPS 204, the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA) in Internet X.509 certificates and CRLs. The conventions for the associated signatures, subject public keys, and private key are also described.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9881
- Published
- October 2025
- Authors
- J. Massimo; P. Kampanakis; S. Turner; B. E. Westerbaan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 91
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9935Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure - Algorithm Identifiers for the Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM)Current
March 2026
- RFC 9802Use of the HSS and XMSS Hash-Based Signature Algorithms in Internet X.509 Public Key InfrastructureCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 4490Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94, and GOST R 34.10-2001 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
May 2006
- RFC 9763Related Certificates for Use in Multiple Authentications within a ProtocolCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9734X.509 Certificate Extended Key Usage (EKU) for Instant Messaging URIsCurrent
February 2025
- RFC 9295Clarifications for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 Algorithm IdentifiersCurrent
September 2022
- RFC 9216S/MIME Example Keys and CertificatesCurrent
April 2022
- RFC 8813Clarifications for Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key InformationCurrent
August 2020
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?