RFC 9813: Operational Considerations for Using TLS Pre-Shared Keys (TLS-PSKs) with RADIUS
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides implementation and operational considerations for using TLS Pre-Shared Keys (TLS-PSKs) with RADIUS/TLS (RFC 6614) and RADIUS/DTLS (RFC 7360). The purpose of the document is to help smooth the operational transition from the use of RADIUS/UDP to RADIUS/TLS.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9813
- Published
- July 2025
- Authors
- A. DeKok
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- BCP243
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9814Use of the SLH-DSA Signature Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
July 2025
- RFC 9811Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- HTTP Transfer for the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)Current
July 2025
- RFC 9810Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)Current
July 2025
- RFC 9809X.509 Certificate Extended Key Usage (EKU) for Configuration, Updates, and Safety-Critical CommunicationCurrent
July 2025
- RFC 9820Authentication Service Based on the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) for Use with the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Current
September 2025
- RFC 9802Use of the HSS and XMSS Hash-Based Signature Algorithms in Internet X.509 Public Key InfrastructureCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9799Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Extensions for ".onion" Special-Use Domain NamesCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9827Renaming the Extended Sequence Numbers (ESN) Transform Type in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)Current
November 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?