RFC 9791: Use Cases for MPLS Network Action Indicators and Ancillary Data
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document presents use cases that have a common feature that may be addressed by encoding network action indicators and associated ancillary data within MPLS packets. There is community interest in extending the MPLS data plane to carry such indicators and ancillary data to address these use cases. The use cases described in this document are not an exhaustive set but rather the ones that have been actively discussed by members of the IETF MPLS, PALS, and DetNet Working Groups from the beginning of work on MPLS Network Action (MNA) until the publication of this document.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9791
- Published
- July 2025
- Authors
- T. Saad; K. Makhijani; H. Song; G. Mirsky
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9792Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3Current
June 2025
- RFC 9790IANA Registry and Processing Recommendations for the First Nibble Following a Label StackCurrent
July 2025
- RFC 9793BGP Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)Current
June 2025
- RFC 9789MPLS Network Actions (MNAs) FrameworkUpdated
July 2025
- RFC 9786EVPN Port-Active Redundancy ModeCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9785Preference-Based EVPN Designated Forwarder (DF) ElectionCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9784Virtual Ethernet Segments for EVPN and Provider Backbone Bridge EVPNCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9798PIM Join/Prune Attributes for Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Environments Using Underlay MulticastCurrent
June 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?