RFC 9714: Encapsulation for MPLS Performance Measurement with the Alternate-Marking Method
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance measurement with the Alternate-Marking Method, which performs flow-based packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on MPLS traffic.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9714
- Published
- February 2025
- Authors
- W. Cheng; X. Min; T. Zhou; J. Dai; Y. Peleg
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9716Mechanisms for MPLS Ping and Traceroute Procedures in Inter-Domain Segment Routing NetworksCurrent
February 2025
- RFC 9719YANG Data Model for Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT)Current
April 2025
- RFC 9721Extended Mobility Procedures for Ethernet VPN Integrated Routing and Bridging (EVPN-IRB)Current
April 2025
- RFC 9722Fast Recovery for EVPN Designated Forwarder ElectionCurrent
May 2025
- RFC 9723BGP Colored Prefix Routing (CPR) for Services Based on Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)Current
May 2025
- RFC 9705Refresh-Interval Independent RSVP Fast Reroute Facility ProtectionCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9703Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing (SR) Egress Peer Engineering (EPE) Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data PlaneCurrent
December 2024
- RFC 9702YANG Data Model for Maximum Segment Identifier (SID) Depth (MSD) Types and MPLS MSDCurrent
January 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?