RFC 9695: The 'haptics' Top-Level Media Type
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo registers and documents the 'haptics' top-level media type, under which subtypes for representation formats for haptics may be registered. This document also serves as a registration for a set of subtypes, which are representative of some existing subtypes already in use.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9695
- Published
- March 2025
- Authors
- Y. K. Muthusamy; C. Ullrich
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 9993
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9694Guidelines for the Definition of New Top-Level Media TypesCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9698The JMAPACCESS Extension for IMAPCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9682Updates to the Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL) GrammarCurrent
November 2024
- RFC 9671Sieve Email Filtering: Extension for Processing Calendar AttachmentsCurrent
October 2024
- RFC 9670JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) SharingCurrent
November 2024
- RFC 9661The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve ScriptsCurrent
September 2024
- RFC 9738IMAP MESSAGELIMIT ExtensionCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9741Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): Additional Control Operators for the Conversion and Processing of TextCurrent
March 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?