RFC 9617: A YANG Data Model for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) is an example of an on-path hybrid measurement method. IOAM defines a method for producing operational and telemetry information that may be exported using the in-band or out-of-band method. RFCs 9197 and 9326 discuss the data fields and associated data types for IOAM. This document defines a YANG module for the configuration of IOAM functions.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9617
- Published
- August 2024
- Authors
- T. Zhou; J. Guichard; F. Brockners; S. Raghavan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 28
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9232Network Telemetry FrameworkCurrent
May 2022
- RFC 8994An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)Current
May 2021
- RFC 8349A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)Current
March 2018
- RFC 8022A YANG Data Model for Routing ManagementObsoleted
November 2016
- RFC 6632An Overview of the IETF Network Management StandardsCurrent
June 2012
- RFC 6241Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)Updated
June 2011
- RFC 4744Using the NETCONF Protocol over the Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)Updated
December 2006
- RFC 3591Definitions of Managed Objects for the Optical Interface TypeCurrent
September 2003
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?