RFC 9536: Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Reverse Search
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) does not include query capabilities for finding the list of domains related to a set of entities matching a given search pattern. Considering that an RDAP entity can be associated with any defined object class and other relationships between RDAP object classes exist, a reverse search can be applied to other use cases besides the classic domain-entity scenario. This document describes an RDAP extension that allows servers to provide a reverse search feature based on the relationship defined in RDAP between an object class for search and any related object class. The reverse search based on the domain-entity relationship is treated as a particular case.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9536
- Published
- April 2024
- Authors
- M. Loffredo; M. Martinelli
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 17
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9560Federated Authentication for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Using OpenID ConnectCurrent
April 2024
- RFC 8982Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Partial ResponseCurrent
February 2021
- RFC 8977Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Query Parameters for Result Sorting and PagingCurrent
January 2021
- RFC 8521Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Object TaggingCurrent
November 2018
- RFC 8605vCard Format Extensions: ICANN Extensions for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)Current
May 2019
- RFC 7481Security Services for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)Current
March 2015
- RFC 9537Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) ResponseCurrent
March 2024
- RFC 9534Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for Performance Measurement on a Link Aggregation GroupCurrent
January 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?