RFC 9343: IPv6 Application of the Alternate-Marking Method
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes how the Alternate-Marking Method can be used as a passive performance measurement tool in an IPv6 domain. It defines an Extension Header Option to encode Alternate-Marking information in both the Hop-by-Hop Options Header and Destination Options Header.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9343
- Published
- December 2022
- Authors
- G. Fioccola; T. Zhou; M. Cociglio; F. Qin; R. Pang
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9947Application of the Alternate-Marking Method to the Segment Routing HeaderCurrent
March 2026
- RFC 9342Clustered Alternate-Marking MethodCurrent
December 2022
- RFC 9506Explicit Host-to-Network Flow Measurements TechniquesCurrent
October 2023
- RFC 6703Reporting IP Network Performance Metrics: Different Points of ViewCurrent
August 2012
- RFC 8911Registry for Performance MetricsCurrent
November 2021
- RFC 9956A Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) for Differentiated ServicesCurrent
May 2026
- RFC 7680A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)Current
January 2016
- RFC 7679A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)Current
January 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?