RFC 9125: Gateway Auto-Discovery and Route Advertisement for Site Interconnection Using Segment Routing
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Data centers are attached to the Internet or a backbone network by gateway routers. One data center typically has more than one gateway for commercial, load-balancing, and resiliency reasons. Other sites, such as access networks, also need to be connected across backbone networks through gateways. This document defines a mechanism using the BGP Tunnel Encapsulation attribute to allow data center gateway routers to advertise routes to the prefixes reachable in the site, including advertising them on behalf of other gateways at the same site. This allows segment routing to be used to identify multiple paths across the Internet or backbone network between different gateways. The paths can be selected for load-balancing, resilience, and quality purposes.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9125
- Published
- August 2021
- Authors
- A. Farrel; J. Drake; E. Rosen; K. Patel; L. Jalil
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8669Segment Routing Prefix Segment Identifier Extensions for BGPCurrent
December 2019
- RFC 9857Advertisement of Segment Routing Policies Using BGP - Link StateCurrent
October 2025
- RFC 9127YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)Updated
October 2021
- RFC 9086Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer EngineeringCurrent
August 2021
- RFC 9072Extended Optional Parameters Length for BGP OPEN MessageCurrent
July 2021
- RFC 9234Route Leak Prevention and Detection Using Roles in UPDATE and OPEN MessagesCurrent
May 2022
- RFC 9013OSPF Advertisement of Tunnel EncapsulationsCurrent
April 2021
- RFC 9012The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation AttributeUpdated
April 2021
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?