RFC 9099: Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 networks securely is available, whether the operator is an Internet Service Provider (ISP) or an enterprise internal network. However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges. RFC 4942 describes security issues in the protocol, but network managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices. This document analyzes the operational security issues associated with several types of networks and proposes technical and procedural mitigation techniques. This document is only applicable to managed networks, such as enterprise networks, service provider networks, or managed residential networks.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9099
- Published
- August 2021
- Authors
- É. Vyncke; K. Chittimaneni; M. Kaeo; E. Rey
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 48
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4890Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in FirewallsCurrent
May 2007
- RFC 4835Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)Obsoleted
April 2007
- RFC 4305Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)Obsoleted
December 2005
- RFC 4303IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)Current
December 2005
- RFC 4302IP Authentication HeaderCurrent
December 2005
- RFC 2406IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)Obsoleted
November 1998
- RFC 2402IP Authentication HeaderObsoleted
November 1998
- RFC 1826IP Authentication HeaderObsoleted
August 1995
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?