RFC 9028: Native NAT Traversal Mode for the Host Identity Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies a new Network Address Translator (NAT) traversal mode for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The new mode is based on the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) methodology and UDP encapsulation of data and signaling traffic. The main difference from the previously specified modes is the use of HIP messages instead of ICE for all NAT traversal procedures due to the kernel-space dependencies of HIP.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9028
- Published
- July 2021
- Authors
- A. Keränen; J. Melén; M. Komu
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 55
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6544TCP Candidates with Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)Current
March 2012
- RFC 9063Host Identity Protocol ArchitectureCurrent
July 2021
- RFC 8047Host Multihoming with the Host Identity ProtocolCurrent
February 2017
- RFC 8046Host Mobility with the Host Identity ProtocolCurrent
February 2017
- RFC 8005Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) ExtensionCurrent
October 2016
- RFC 8004Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous ExtensionCurrent
October 2016
- RFC 8003Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration ExtensionCurrent
October 2016
- RFC 7648Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy FunctionCurrent
September 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?