RFC 8914: Extended DNS Errors
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines an extensible method to return additional information about the cause of DNS errors. Though created primarily to extend SERVFAIL to provide additional information about the cause of DNS and DNSSEC failures, the Extended DNS Errors option defined in this document allows all response types to contain extended error information. Extended DNS Error information does not change the processing of RCODEs.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8914
- Published
- October 2020
- Authors
- W. Kumari; E. Hunt; R. Arends; W. Hardaker; D. Lawrence
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8913Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) YANG Data ModelCurrent
November 2021
- RFC 8912Initial Performance Metrics Registry EntriesCurrent
November 2021
- RFC 8911Registry for Performance MetricsCurrent
November 2021
- RFC 8909Registry Data Escrow SpecificationCurrent
November 2020
- RFC 8907The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) ProtocolUpdated
September 2020
- RFC 8906A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to CommunicateCurrent
September 2020
- RFC 8901Multi-Signer DNSSEC ModelsCurrent
September 2020
- RFC 8897Requirements for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Relying PartiesCurrent
September 2020
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?