RFC 8767: Serving Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines a method (serve-stale) for recursive resolvers to use stale DNS data to avoid outages when authoritative nameservers cannot be reached to refresh expired data. One of the motivations for serve-stale is to make the DNS more resilient to DoS attacks and thereby make them less attractive as an attack vector. This document updates the definitions of TTL from RFCs 1034 and 1035 so that data can be kept in the cache beyond the TTL expiry; it also updates RFC 2181 by interpreting values with the high-order bit set as being positive, rather than 0, and suggests a cap of 7 days.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8767
- Published
- March 2020
- Authors
- D. Lawrence; W. Kumari; P. Sood
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8482Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS Queries That Have QTYPE=ANYCurrent
January 2019
- RFC 6382Unique Origin Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) per Node for Globally Anycasted ServicesCurrent
October 2011
- RFC 8749Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic StatusCurrent
March 2020
- RFC 8806Running a Root Server Local to a ResolverCurrent
June 2020
- RFC 8618Compacted-DNS (C-DNS): A Format for DNS Packet CaptureCurrent
September 2019
- RFC 8976Message Digest for DNS ZonesCurrent
February 2021
- RFC 8553DNS Attrleaf Changes: Fixing Specifications That Use Underscored Node NamesCurrent
March 2019
- RFC 8552Scoped Interpretation of DNS Resource Records through "Underscored" Naming of Attribute LeavesCurrent
March 2019
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?