RFC 8593: Video Traffic Models for RTP Congestion Control Evaluations
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes two reference video traffic models for evaluating RTP congestion control algorithms. The first model statistically characterizes the behavior of a live video encoder in response to changing requests on the target video rate. The second model is trace-driven and emulates the output of actual encoded video frame sizes from a high-resolution test sequence. Both models are designed to strike a balance between simplicity, repeatability, and authenticity in modeling the interactions between a live video traffic source and the congestion control module. Finally, the document describes how both approaches can be combined into a hybrid model.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8593
- Published
- May 2019
- Authors
- X. Zhu; S. Mena; Z. Sarker
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 19
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8698Network-Assisted Dynamic Adaptation (NADA): A Unified Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time MediaCurrent
February 2020
- RFC 8867Test Cases for Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time MediaCurrent
January 2021
- RFC 8084Network Transport Circuit BreakersCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8868Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time MediaCurrent
January 2021
- RFC 8869Evaluation Test Cases for Interactive Real-Time Media over Wireless NetworksCurrent
January 2021
- RFC 8298Self-Clocked Rate Adaptation for MultimediaCurrent
December 2017
- RFC 8041Use Cases and Operational Experience with Multipath TCPCurrent
January 2017
- RFC 7837IPv6 Destination Option for Congestion Exposure (ConEx)Current
May 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?