RFC 8476: Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using OSPF
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines a way for an Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) router to advertise multiple types of supported Maximum SID Depths (MSDs) at node and/or link granularity. Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized controllers) to determine whether a particular Segment Identifier (SID) stack can be supported in a given network. This document only refers to the Signaling MSD as defined in RFC 8491, but it defines an encoding that can support other MSD types. Here, the term "OSPF" means both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8476
- Published
- December 2018
- Authors
- J. Tantsura; U. Chunduri; S. Aldrin; P. Psenak
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8491Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using IS-ISCurrent
November 2018
- RFC 8814Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link StateCurrent
August 2020
- RFC 9085Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment RoutingUpdated
August 2021
- RFC 8665OSPF Extensions for Segment RoutingCurrent
December 2019
- RFC 8666OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment RoutingCurrent
December 2019
- RFC 9247BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)Current
June 2022
- RFC 9294Application-Specific Link Attributes Advertisement Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS)Current
August 2022
- RFC 9351Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Flexible Algorithm AdvertisementCurrent
February 2023
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?