RFC 8407: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9907.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 9907 — Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of specifications containing YANG modules. Recommendations and procedures are defined, which are intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF protocol implementations that utilize YANG modules. This document obsoletes RFC 6087.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8407
- Published
- October 2018
- Authors
- A. Bierman
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 63
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 6087 (2011)
- RFC 8407 (2018)
- RFC 9907 (2026) ✓
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8349A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)Current
March 2018
- RFC 8342Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)Updated
March 2018
- RFC 8309Service Models ExplainedCurrent
January 2018
- RFC 8022A YANG Data Model for Routing ManagementObsoleted
November 2016
- RFC 7895YANG Module LibraryObsoleted
June 2016
- RFC 9182A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNsCurrent
February 2022
- RFC 9196YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update NotificationsCurrent
February 2022
- RFC 9890An Update to YANG Module Names RegistrationCurrent
October 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?