RFC 8397: Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Multilevel Using Unique Nicknames
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) routing can be extended to support multiple levels by building on the multilevel feature of IS-IS routing. Depending on how nicknames are managed, there are two primary alternatives to realize TRILL multilevel: the unique nickname approach and the aggregated nickname approach as discussed in RFC 8243. This document specifies a unique nickname approach. This approach gives unique nicknames to all TRILL switches across the multilevel TRILL campus.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8397
- Published
- May 2018
- Authors
- M. Zhang; D. Eastlake 3rd; R. Perlman; H. Zhai; D. Liu
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9183Single Nickname for an Area Border RBridge in Multilevel Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL)Current
February 2022
- RFC 8395Extensions to BGP-Signaled Pseudowires to Support Flow-Aware Transport LabelsCurrent
June 2018
- RFC 8400Extensions to RSVP-TE for Label Switched Path (LSP) Egress ProtectionCurrent
June 2018
- RFC 8394Split Network Virtualization Edge (Split-NVE) Control-Plane RequirementsCurrent
May 2018
- RFC 8393Operating the Network Service Header (NSH) with Next Protocol "None"Current
May 2018
- RFC 8401Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Support via IS-ISUpdated
June 2018
- RFC 8402Segment Routing ArchitectureUpdated
July 2018
- RFC 8403A Scalable and Topology-Aware MPLS Data-Plane Monitoring SystemCurrent
July 2018
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?