RFC 8358: Update to Digital Signatures on Internet-Draft Documents
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 5485 specifies the conventions for digital signatures on Internet-Drafts. The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) is used to create a detached signature, which is stored in a separate companion file so that no existing utilities are impacted by the addition of the digital signature. The RFC Editor recently published the first RFC that includes non- ASCII characters in a text file. The conventions specified in RFC 7997 were followed. We assume that non-ASCII characters will soon start appearing in Internet-Drafts as well. This document updates the handling of digital signatures on Internet-Drafts that contain non-ASCII characters in a text file. This document updates RFC 5485.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8358
- Published
- March 2018
- Authors
- R. Housley
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 5485
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6019BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1Current
September 2010
- RFC 4049BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1Obsoleted
April 2005
- RFC 3852Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Obsoleted
July 2004
- RFC 3657Use of the Camellia Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
January 2004
- RFC 3565Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
July 2003
- RFC 3560Use of the RSAES-OAEP Key Transport Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
July 2003
- RFC 3370Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) AlgorithmsUpdated
September 2002
- RFC 3274Compressed Data Content Type for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
June 2002
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?