RFC 8262: Content-ID Header Field in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies the Content-ID header field for usage in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). This document also updates RFC 5621, which only allows a Content-ID URL to reference a body part that is part of a multipart message-body. This update enables a Content-ID URL to reference a complete message-body and metadata provided by some additional SIP header fields. This document updates RFC 5368 and RFC 6442 by clarifying their usage of the SIP Content-ID header field.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8262
- Published
- October 2017
- Authors
- C. Holmberg; I. Sedlacek
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8266Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing NicknamesCurrent
October 2017
- RFC 8224Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Updated
February 2018
- RFC 8197A SIP Response Code for Unwanted CallsCurrent
July 2017
- RFC 8373Negotiating Human Language in Real-Time CommunicationsUpdated
May 2018
- RFC 8396Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, and Registering Telephone Numbers (MODERN): Problem Statement, Use Cases, and FrameworkCurrent
July 2018
- RFC 8076A Usage for Shared Resources in RELOAD (ShaRe)Current
March 2017
- RFC 8048Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): PresenceCurrent
December 2016
- RFC 8497Marking SIP Messages to Be LoggedCurrent
November 2018
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?