RFC 8256: Requirements for Hitless MPLS Path Segment Monitoring
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
One of the most important Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) capabilities for transport-network operation is fault localization. An in-service, on-demand path segment monitoring function of a transport path is indispensable, particularly when the service monitoring function is activated only between endpoints. However, the current segment monitoring approach defined for MPLS (including the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)) in RFC 6371 "Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks" has drawbacks. This document provides an analysis of the existing MPLS-TP OAM mechanisms for the path segment monitoring and provides requirements to guide the development of new OAM tools to support Hitless Path Segment Monitoring (HPSM).
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8256
- Published
- October 2017
- Authors
- A. D'Alessandro; L. Andersson; S. Ueno; K. Arai; Y. Koike
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7759Configuration of Proactive Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-Based Transport Networks Using Label Switched Path (LSP) PingCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 7487Configuration of Proactive Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-Based Transport Networks Using RSVP-TECurrent
March 2015
- RFC 8185Dual-Homing Coordination for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires ProtectionCurrent
June 2017
- RFC 8184Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) PseudowiresCurrent
June 2017
- RFC 7325MPLS Forwarding Compliance and Performance RequirementsCurrent
August 2014
- RFC 7190Use of Multipath with MPLS and MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)Current
March 2014
- RFC 7167A Framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS in Transport NetworksCurrent
April 2014
- RFC 6428Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport ProfileUpdated
November 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?