RFC 8248: Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) Requirements
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines the scope and set of requirements for the Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) architecture, data model, and transfer protocols. The requirements and scope are based on the agreed-upon use cases described in RFC 7632.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8248
- Published
- September 2017
- Authors
- N. Cam-Winget; L. Lorenzin
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7632Endpoint Security Posture Assessment: Enterprise Use CasesCurrent
September 2015
- RFC 8247Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)Updated
September 2017
- RFC 8252OAuth 2.0 for Native AppsCurrent
October 2017
- RFC 8229TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec PacketsObsoleted
August 2017
- RFC 8268More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH) Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)Current
December 2017
- RFC 8270Increase the Secure Shell Minimum Recommended Diffie-Hellman Modulus Size to 2048 BitsCurrent
December 2017
- RFC 8274Incident Object Description Exchange Format Usage GuidanceCurrent
November 2017
- RFC 8221Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)Updated
October 2017
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?