RFC 8219: Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Transition Technologies
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Benchmarking methodologies that address the performance of network interconnect devices that are IPv4- or IPv6-capable exist, but the IPv6 transition technologies are outside of their scope. This document provides complementary guidelines for evaluating the performance of IPv6 transition technologies. More specifically, this document targets IPv6 transition technologies that employ encapsulation or translation mechanisms, as dual-stack nodes can be tested using the recommendations of RFCs 2544 and 5180. The methodology also includes a metric for benchmarking load scalability.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8219
- Published
- August 2017
- Authors
- M. Georgescu; L. Pislaru; G. Lencse
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 30
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9313Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS)Current
October 2022
- RFC 8683Additional Deployment Guidelines for NAT64/464XLAT in Operator and Enterprise NetworksCurrent
November 2019
- RFC 7051Analysis of Solution Proposals for Hosts to Learn NAT64 PrefixCurrent
November 2013
- RFC 7050Discovery of the IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address SynthesisUpdated
November 2013
- RFC 7934Host Address Availability RecommendationsCurrent
July 2016
- RFC 9872Recommendations for Discovering IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address SynthesisCurrent
September 2025
- RFC 5481Packet Delay Variation Applicability StatementCurrent
March 2009
- RFC 8115DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 PrefixesCurrent
March 2017
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?