RFC 8123: Requirements for Marking SIP Messages to be Logged
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
SIP networks use signaling monitoring tools to debug customer- reported problems and for regression testing if network or client software is upgraded. As networks grow and become interconnected, including connection via transit networks, it becomes impractical to predict the path that SIP signaling will take between clients and, therefore, impractical to monitor SIP signaling end-to-end. This document describes the requirements for adding an indicator to the SIP Protocol Data Unit (PDU) or a SIP message that marks the PDU as a candidate for logging. Such a marking will typically be applied as part of network testing controlled by the network operator and not used in regular client signaling. However, such a marking can be carried end-to-end, including the SIP terminals, even if a session originates and terminates in different networks.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8123
- Published
- March 2017
- Authors
- P. Dawes; C. Arunachalam
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8497Marking SIP Messages to Be LoggedCurrent
November 2018
- RFC 7989End-to-End Session Identification in IP-Based Multimedia Communication NetworksCurrent
October 2016
- RFC 7937Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Logging InterfaceCurrent
August 2016
- RFC 9144Comparison of Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) DatastoresCurrent
December 2021
- RFC 6872The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Framework and Information ModelCurrent
February 2013
- RFC 8122Connection-Oriented Media Transport over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)Updated
March 2017
- RFC 8124The Session Description Protocol (SDP) WebSocket Connection URI AttributeCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8130RTP Payload Format for the Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) CodecCurrent
March 2017
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?