RFC 8095: Services Provided by IETF Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes, surveys, and classifies the protocol mechanisms provided by existing IETF protocols, as background for determining a common set of transport services. It examines the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Multipath TCP, the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), UDP-Lite, the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP), File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport / Asynchronous Layered Coding (FLUTE/ALC) for Reliable Multicast, NACK- Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM), Transport Layer Security (TLS), Datagram TLS (DTLS), and the Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP), when HTTP is used as a pseudotransport. This survey provides background for the definition of transport services within the TAPS working group.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8095
- Published
- March 2017
- Authors
- G. Fairhurst; B. Trammell; M. Kuehlewind
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 54
- Also known as
- —
Topics
- Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Multipath TCP (MPTCP)
- Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
- User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
- UDP-Lite
- Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)
- Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
- Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP)
- File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport/Asynchronous Layered Coding (FLUTE/ALC) for Reliable Multicast
- NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM)
- Transport Layer Security (TLS)
- Datagram TLS (DTLS)
- Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP)
- TAPS
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8923A Minimal Set of Transport Services for End SystemsCurrent
October 2020
- RFC 6069Making TCP More Robust to Long Connectivity Disruptions (TCP-LCD)Current
December 2010
- RFC 3828The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite)Updated
July 2004
- RFC 4019RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Profiles for User Datagram Protocol (UDP) LiteUpdated
April 2005
- RFC 8100Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and PracticeCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8086GRE-in-UDP EncapsulationCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8085UDP Usage GuidelinesUpdated
March 2017
- RFC 8084Network Transport Circuit BreakersCurrent
March 2017
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?