RFC 8094: DNS over Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
DNS queries and responses are visible to network elements on the path between the DNS client and its server. These queries and responses can contain privacy-sensitive information, which is valuable to protect. This document proposes the use of Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) for DNS, to protect against passive listeners and certain active attacks. As latency is critical for DNS, this proposal also discusses mechanisms to reduce DTLS round trips and reduce the DTLS handshake size. The proposed mechanism runs over port 853.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8094
- Published
- February 2017
- Authors
- T. Reddy; D. Wing; P. Patil
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8096The IPv6-Specific MIB Modules Are ObsoleteCurrent
April 2017
- RFC 8105Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) Ultra Low Energy (ULE)Current
May 2017
- RFC 8106IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS ConfigurationCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8114Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast NetworkCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8074Source Address Validation Improvement (SAVI) for Mixed Address Assignment Methods ScenarioCurrent
February 2017
- RFC 8115DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 PrefixesCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8117Current Hostname Practice Considered HarmfulCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8066IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) ESC Dispatch Code Points and GuidelinesCurrent
February 2017
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?