RFC 8075: Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides reference information for implementing a cross-protocol network proxy that performs translation from the HTTP protocol to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). This will enable an HTTP client to access resources on a CoAP server through the proxy. This document describes how an HTTP request is mapped to a CoAP request and how a CoAP response is mapped back to an HTTP response. This includes guidelines for status code, URI, and media type mappings, as well as additional interworking advice.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC8075
- Published
- February 2017
- Authors
- A. Castellani; S. Loreto; A. Rahman; T. Fossati; E. Dijk
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 40
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8132PATCH and FETCH Methods for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Current
April 2017
- RFC 7959Block-Wise Transfers in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Updated
August 2016
- RFC 8323CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) over TCP, TLS, and WebSocketsUpdated
February 2018
- RFC 8516"Too Many Requests" Response Code for the Constrained Application ProtocolCurrent
January 2019
- RFC 8710Multipart Content-Format for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Current
February 2020
- RFC 8790FETCH and PATCH with Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)Current
June 2020
- RFC 9290Concise Problem Details for Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) APIsCurrent
October 2022
- RFC 9423Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Target Attributes RegistryCurrent
April 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?