RFC 7997: The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In order to support the internationalization of protocols and a more diverse Internet community, the RFC Series must evolve to allow for the use of non-ASCII characters in RFCs. While English remains the required language of the Series, the encoding of future RFCs will be in UTF-8, allowing for a broader range of characters than typically used in the English language. This document describes the RFC Editor requirements and gives guidance regarding the use of non-ASCII characters in RFCs. This document updates RFC 7322. Please view this document in PDF form to see the full text.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7997
- Published
- December 2016
- Authors
- H. Flanagan
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IAB
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7994Requirements for Plain-Text RFCsUpdated
December 2016
- RFC 7998"xml2rfc" Version 3 Preparation Tool DescriptionCurrent
December 2016
- RFC 7996SVG Drawings for RFCs: SVG 1.2 RFCObsoleted
December 2016
- RFC 7995PDF Format for RFCsUpdated
December 2016
- RFC 7993Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Requirements for RFCsUpdated
December 2016
- RFC 7992HTML Format for RFCsUpdated
December 2016
- RFC 7991The "xml2rfc" Version 3 VocabularyUpdated
December 2016
- RFC 7990RFC Format FrameworkObsoleted
December 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?