CurrentPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 7987: IS-IS Minimum Remaining Lifetime

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

Corruption of the Remaining Lifetime field in a Link State Protocol Data Unit (LSP) can go undetected. In certain scenarios, this may cause or exacerbate flooding storms. It is also a possible denial-of-service attack vector. This document defines a backwards-compatible solution to this problem.

Document record

Document ID
RFC7987
Published
October 2016
Authors
L. Ginsberg; P. Wells; B. Decraene; T. Przygienda; H. Gredler
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
rtg
Pages
9
Also known as

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/7987-is-is-minimum-remaining-lifetime