RFC 7891: Explicit Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) Vector
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The PIM Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) Vector TLV defined in RFC 5496 can be included in a PIM Join Attribute such that the RPF neighbor is selected based on the unicast reachability of the RPF Vector instead of the source or Rendezvous Point associated with the multicast tree. This document defines a new RPF Vector Attribute type such that an explicit RPF neighbor list can be encoded in the PIM Join Attribute, thus bypassing the unicast route lookup.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7891
- Published
- June 2016
- Authors
- J. Asghar; IJ. Wijnands; S. Krishnaswamy; A. Karan; V. Arya
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9860Multicast-Only Fast Reroute (MoFRR) Based on Topology Independent Loop-Free Alternate (TI-LFA) Fast RerouteCurrent
October 2025
- RFC 7892IANA Allocation Procedures for the GMPLS OTN Signal Type RegistryCurrent
May 2016
- RFC 7893Pseudowire Congestion ConsiderationsCurrent
June 2016
- RFC 7887Hierarchical Join/Prune AttributesCurrent
June 2016
- RFC 7886Advertising Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminators in the Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)Current
July 2016
- RFC 7896Update to the Include Route Object (IRO) Specification in the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)Current
June 2016
- RFC 7897Domain Subobjects for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)Current
June 2016
- RFC 7885Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV)Current
July 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?