RFC 7888: IMAP4 Non-synchronizing Literals
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Internet Message Access Protocol (RFC 3501) contains the "literal" syntactic construct for communicating strings. When sending a literal from client to server, IMAP requires the client to wait for the server to send a command continuation request between sending the octet count and the string data. This document specifies an alternate form of literal that does not require this network round trip. This document specifies 2 IMAP extensions: LITERAL+ and LITERAL-. LITERAL+ allows the alternate form of literals in all IMAP commands. LITERAL- is the same as LITERAL+, but it disallows the alternate form of literals unless they are 4096 bytes or less. This document obsoletes RFC 2088.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7888
- Published
- May 2016
- Authors
- A. Melnikov
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoletes:
- RFC 2088
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7377IMAP4 Multimailbox SEARCH ExtensionCurrent
October 2014
- RFC 8437IMAP UNAUTHENTICATE Extension for Connection ReuseCurrent
August 2018
- RFC 8438IMAP Extension for STATUS=SIZECurrent
August 2018
- RFC 8474IMAP Extension for Object IdentifiersCurrent
September 2018
- RFC 8514Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - SAVEDATE ExtensionCurrent
January 2019
- RFC 9051Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2Current
August 2021
- RFC 9585IMAP Response Code for Command Progress NotificationsCurrent
May 2024
- RFC 9586IMAP Extension for Using and Returning Unique Identifiers (UIDs) OnlyCurrent
May 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?