RFC 7828: The edns-tcp-keepalive EDNS0 Option
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
DNS messages between clients and servers may be received over either UDP or TCP. UDP transport involves keeping less state on a busy server, but can cause truncation and retries over TCP. Additionally, UDP can be exploited for reflection attacks. Using TCP would reduce retransmits and amplification. However, clients commonly use TCP only for retries and servers typically use idle timeouts on the order of seconds. This document defines an EDNS0 option ("edns-tcp-keepalive") that allows DNS servers to signal a variable idle timeout. This signalling encourages the use of long-lived TCP connections by allowing the state associated with TCP transport to be managed effectively with minimal impact on the DNS transaction time.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7828
- Published
- April 2016
- Authors
- P. Wouters; J. Abley; S. Dickinson; R. Bellis
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7766DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation RequirementsUpdated
March 2016
- RFC 7646Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust AnchorsCurrent
September 2015
- RFC 8027DNSSEC Roadblock AvoidanceCurrent
November 2016
- RFC 8145Signaling Trust Anchor Knowledge in DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)Updated
April 2017
- RFC 7344Automating DNSSEC Delegation Trust MaintenanceUpdated
September 2014
- RFC 8509A Root Key Trust Anchor Sentinel for DNSSECCurrent
December 2018
- RFC 8749Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic StatusCurrent
March 2020
- RFC 6841A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice StatementsCurrent
January 2013
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?