RFC 780: Mail Transfer Protocol
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 788.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 5321 — Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 780, "Mail Transfer Protocol", was published in May 1981 by S. Sluizer; J. Postel. This is one of the earlier, shorter RFCs and the RFC Editor index carries no abstract for it — the full text below is the authoritative source.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC780
- Published
- May 1981
- Authors
- S. Sluizer; J. Postel
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 47
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 10 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 784Mail Transfer Protocol: ISI TOPS20 implementationCurrent
July 1981
- RFC 785Mail Transfer Protocol: ISI TOPS20 file definitionsCurrent
July 1981
- RFC 786Mail Transfer Protocol: ISI TOPS20 MTP-NIMAIL interfaceCurrent
July 1981
- RFC 1301Multicast Transport ProtocolCurrent
February 1992
- RFC 1339Remote Mail Checking ProtocolCurrent
June 1992
- RFC 1343A User Agent Configuration Mechanism for Multimedia Mail Format InformationCurrent
June 1992
- RFC 1344Implications of MIME for Internet Mail GatewaysCurrent
June 1992
- RFC 1357A Format for E-mailing Bibliographic RecordsObsoleted
July 1992
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?