RFC 7797: JSON Web Signature (JWS) Unencoded Payload Option
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
JSON Web Signature (JWS) represents the payload of a JWS as a base64url-encoded value and uses this value in the JWS Signature computation. While this enables arbitrary payloads to be integrity protected, some have described use cases in which the base64url encoding is unnecessary and/or an impediment to adoption, especially when the payload is large and/or detached. This specification defines a means of accommodating these use cases by defining an option to change the JWS Signing Input computation to not base64url- encode the payload. This option is intended to broaden the set of use cases for which the use of JWS is a good fit. This specification updates RFC 7519 by stating that JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) MUST NOT use the unencoded payload option defined by this specification.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7797
- Published
- February 2016
- Authors
- M. Jones
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 7519
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7520Examples of Protecting Content Using JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)Current
May 2015
- RFC 7517JSON Web Key (JWK)Current
May 2015
- RFC 7516JSON Web Encryption (JWE)Current
May 2015
- RFC 7515JSON Web Signature (JWS)Current
May 2015
- RFC 8725JSON Web Token Best Current PracticesCurrent
February 2020
- RFC 9101The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT-Secured Authorization Request (JAR)Current
August 2021
- RFC 7638JSON Web Key (JWK) ThumbprintCurrent
September 2015
- RFC 8414OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server MetadataCurrent
June 2018
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?