RFC 7570: Label Switched Path (LSP) Attribute in the Explicit Route Object (ERO)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 5420 extends RSVP-TE to specify or record generic attributes that apply to the whole of the path of a Label Switched Path (LSP). This document defines an extension to the RSVP Explicit Route Object (ERO) and Record Route Object (RRO) to allow them to specify or record generic attributes that apply to a given hop.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7570
- Published
- July 2015
- Authors
- C. Margaria; G. Martinelli; S. Balls; B. Wright
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7487Configuration of Proactive Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-Based Transport Networks Using RSVP-TECurrent
March 2015
- RFC 7699Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in Lambda Switch Capable (LSC) Label Switching RoutersCurrent
November 2015
- RFC 8625Ethernet Traffic Parameters with Availability InformationCurrent
August 2019
- RFC 8779Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for GMPLSUpdated
July 2020
- RFC 4558Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello: A Clarification StatementCurrent
June 2006
- RFC 3473Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) ExtensionsUpdated
February 2003
- RFC 6383Advice on When It Is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths Established Using RSVP-TECurrent
September 2011
- RFC 7698Framework and Requirements for GMPLS-Based Control of Flexi-Grid Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) NetworksCurrent
November 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?