RFC 7526: Deprecating the Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Experience with the 6to4 transition mechanism defined in RFC 3056 ("Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds") has shown that the mechanism is unsuitable for widespread deployment and use in the Internet when used in its anycast mode. Therefore, this document requests that RFC 3068 ("An Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers") and RFC 6732 ("6to4 Provider Managed Tunnels") be made obsolete and moved to Historic status. It recommends that future products should not support 6to4 anycast and that existing deployments should be reviewed. This complements the guidelines in RFC 6343.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7526
- Published
- May 2015
- Authors
- O. Troan; B. Carpenter
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- BCP196
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 3068 (2001)
- RFC 6732 (2012)
- RFC 7526 (2015)
Read the full history of Deprecating the Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers →
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7534AS112 Nameserver OperationsCurrent
May 2015
- RFC 7535AS112 Redirection Using DNAMECurrent
May 2015
- RFC 7536Large-Scale Broadband Measurement Use CasesCurrent
May 2015
- RFC 7547Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement and RequirementsCurrent
May 2015
- RFC 7548Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Use CasesCurrent
May 2015
- RFC 7502Methodology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic Session Setup and RegistrationCurrent
April 2015
- RFC 7501Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic Session Setup and RegistrationCurrent
April 2015
- RFC 7497Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement and RequirementsCurrent
April 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?