ObsoletedPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 7321: Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document updates the Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements for the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH). It also adds usage guidance to help in the selection of these algorithms. ESP and AH protocols make use of various cryptographic algorithms to provide confidentiality and/or data origin authentication to protected data communications in the IP Security (IPsec) architecture. To ensure interoperability between disparate implementations, the IPsec standard specifies a set of mandatory-to- implement algorithms. This document specifies the current set of mandatory-to-implement algorithms for ESP and AH, specifies algorithms that should be implemented because they may be promoted to mandatory at some future time, and also recommends against the implementation of some obsolete algorithms. Usage guidance is also provided to help the user of ESP and AH best achieve their security goals through appropriate choices of cryptographic algorithms.

Document record

Document ID
RFC7321
Published
August 2014
Authors
D. McGrew; P. Hoffman
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
sec
Pages
11
Also known as
Obsoletes:
RFC 4835
Obsoleted by:
RFC 8221

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 10 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 1826 (1995)
  2. RFC 1827 (1995)
  3. RFC 2402 (1998)
  4. RFC 2406 (1998)
  5. RFC 4302 (2005)
  6. RFC 4303 (2005)
  7. RFC 4305 (2005)
  8. RFC 4835 (2007)
  9. RFC 7321 (2014)
  10. RFC 8221 (2017)

Read the full history of Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)

Referenced by

One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/7321-cryptographic-algorithm-implementation-requirements-and-usage-guidance-for-encap