RFC 7260: GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Configuration
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) is an integral part of transport connections; hence, it is required that OAM functions be activated/deactivated in sync with connection commissioning/ decommissioning, in order to avoid spurious alarms and ensure consistent operation. In certain technologies, OAM entities are inherently established once the connection is set up, while other technologies require extra configuration to establish and configure OAM entities. This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support the establishment and configuration of OAM entities along with Label Switched Path signaling.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7260
- Published
- June 2014
- Authors
- A. Takacs; D. Fedyk; J. He
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 24
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7369GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Ethernet Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) ConfigurationCurrent
October 2014
- RFC 5960MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane ArchitectureUpdated
August 2010
- RFC 5921A Framework for MPLS in Transport NetworksUpdated
July 2010
- RFC 7324Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear ProtectionCurrent
July 2014
- RFC 7325MPLS Forwarding Compliance and Performance RequirementsCurrent
August 2014
- RFC 7190Use of Multipath with MPLS and MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)Current
March 2014
- RFC 7167A Framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS in Transport NetworksCurrent
April 2014
- RFC 7487Configuration of Proactive Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-Based Transport Networks Using RSVP-TECurrent
March 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?