RFC 7196: Making Route Flap Damping Usable
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Route Flap Damping (RFD) was first proposed to reduce BGP churn in routers. Unfortunately, RFD was found to severely penalize sites for being well connected because topological richness amplifies the number of update messages exchanged. Many operators have turned RFD off. Based on experimental measurement, this document recommends adjusting a few RFD algorithmic constants and limits in order to reduce the high risks with RFD. The result is damping a non-trivial amount of long-term churn without penalizing well-behaved prefixes' normal convergence process.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7196
- Published
- May 2014
- Authors
- C. Pelsser; R. Bush; K. Patel; P. Mohapatra; O. Maennel
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7190Use of Multipath with MPLS and MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)Current
March 2014
- RFC 7189Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Capability Advertisement for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)Current
March 2014
- RFC 7188Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) and MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Extension TLVsUpdated
April 2014
- RFC 7187Routing Multipoint Relay Optimization for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)Current
April 2014
- RFC 7186Security Threats for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)Updated
April 2014
- RFC 7185Link Metrics for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Routing Protocol OLSRv2 - RationaleCurrent
April 2014
- RFC 7184Definition of Managed Objects for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2Current
April 2014
- RFC 7183Integrity Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)Current
April 2014
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?