RFC 7157: IPv6 Multihoming without Network Address Translation
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Network Address and Port Translation (NAPT) works well for conserving global addresses and addressing multihoming requirements because an IPv4 NAPT router implements three functions: source address selection, next-hop resolution, and (optionally) DNS resolution. For IPv6 hosts, one approach could be the use of IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6). However, NAT and NPTv6 should be avoided, if at all possible, to permit transparent end-to-end connectivity. In this document, we analyze the use cases of multihoming. We also describe functional requirements and possible solutions for multihoming without the use of NAT in IPv6 for hosts and small IPv6 networks that would otherwise be unable to meet minimum IPv6-allocation criteria. We conclude that DHCPv6-based solutions are suitable to solve the multihoming issues described in this document, but NPTv6 may be required as an intermediate solution.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7157
- Published
- March 2014
- Authors
- O. Troan; D. Miles; S. Matsushima; T. Okimoto; D. Wing
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 22
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8512A YANG Module for Network Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)Current
January 2019
- RFC 7156Diameter Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Localized RoutingCurrent
April 2014
- RFC 7155Diameter Network Access Server ApplicationCurrent
April 2014
- RFC 7133Information Elements for Data Link Layer Traffic MeasurementCurrent
May 2014
- RFC 7126Recommendations on Filtering of IPv4 Packets Containing IPv4 OptionsCurrent
February 2014
- RFC 7124Ethernet in the First Mile Copper (EFMCu) Interfaces MIBCurrent
February 2014
- RFC 7123Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 NetworksCurrent
February 2014
- RFC 7119Operation of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol on IPFIX MediatorsCurrent
February 2014
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?