RFC 7031: DHCPv6 Failover Requirements
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The DHCPv6 protocol, defined in RFC 3315, allows for multiple servers to operate on a single network; however, it does not define any way the servers could share information about currently active clients and their leases. Some sites are interested in running multiple servers in such a way as to provide increased availability in case of server failure. In order for this to work reliably, the cooperating primary and secondary servers must maintain a consistent database of the lease information. RFC 3315 allows for, but does not define, any redundancy or failover mechanisms. This document outlines requirements for DHCPv6 failover, enumerates related problems, and discusses the proposed scope of work to be conducted. This document does not define a DHCPv6 failover protocol.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7031
- Published
- September 2013
- Authors
- T. Mrugalski; K. Kinnear
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 17
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8156DHCPv6 Failover ProtocolCurrent
June 2017
- RFC 7037RADIUS Option for the DHCPv6 Relay AgentCurrent
October 2013
- RFC 6853DHCPv6 Redundancy Deployment ConsiderationsCurrent
February 2013
- RFC 7227Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 OptionsCurrent
May 2014
- RFC 7283Handling Unknown DHCPv6 MessagesObsoleted
July 2014
- RFC 7341DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6) TransportCurrent
August 2014
- RFC 7598DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped ClientsUpdated
July 2015
- RFC 7653DHCPv6 Active LeasequeryCurrent
October 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?